Close Menu
  • News
  • Home
  • In Profile
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Technology
  • Events
  • Features
  • Wellbeing & Mental Health
  • Marketing
  • HR & Recruitment
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Events Calendar
  • Business Wall
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • 0843 289 4634
X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
Trending
  • How employers can help LGBTQIA+ employees thrive
  • Meeting Overload: A symptom of a bigger problem?
  • New Chief Revenue Officer joins CBS to drive strategic growth
  • The Death of the Number-Cruncher CFO: 60% Now Leading Strategy Beyond Finance
  • Why it’s time for law firms to embrace smart identity infrastructure
  • Continuity Planning Is Now the Norm for UK Businesses
  • The Resignation Ripple: How One Exit Can Shake an Entire SMB
  • Risk Assessments for Employees who are Deaf or have Hearing Loss
X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
SME Today
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Events Calendar
  • Business Wall
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • 0843 289 4634
  • News
  • Home
  • In Profile
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Technology
  • Events
  • Features
  • Wellbeing
  • Marketing
  • HR & Recruitment
SME Today
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Events Calendar
  • Business Wall
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • 0843 289 4634
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
You are at:Home»Legal»A brief guide to companies and some options for unhappy shareholders
Richard Gore and Claire Boucher, both Partners at Temple Bright

A brief guide to companies and some options for unhappy shareholders

0
Posted By sme-admin on July 29, 2024 Legal

Whilst most shareholders in small and medium businesses will hope the situation never arises, many shareholders (particularly minority shareholders) do find themselves being treated badly. A lot of them do not have shareholders’ agreements in place but there are ways to protect their position and steps that can be taken if negotiation fails.

In this article Richard Gore and Claire Boucher, both Partners at Temple Bright, discuss how shareholders can protect themselves from unreasonable behaviour by other shareholders and directors. They detail what the terminology relating to a company means and how shareholders can go about trying to protect their position.

The options

The availability and viability of all the options open to shareholders depends, in large part, by the contractual framework that exists among the parties and in particular the terms of the articles of association for the company and any shareholders’ agreement.

Shareholders are likely to have various remedies open to them, including the following:

  • The exercise of voting power attaching to their shares, whose effect will depend on factors such as the size of a shareholder’s stake and the terms of the articles and of any shareholders’ agreement. (For instance, the shareholders holding over 50% of voting shares can remove directors, unless they are prevented from doing so by the terms of a shareholders’ agreement.)
  • A claim under the company’s articles of association if there has been a breach.
  • A claim under the shareholders’ agreement if there is one and there has been a breach.
  • A claim in the name of the company (known as a derivative claim).
  • An unfair prejudice petition where the conduct is prejudicial to the petitioning shareholder and their shareholding.
  • A winding up petition sought on just and equitable grounds.

I focus on the last three which may not be commonly understood.

What is a derivative claim?

If a shareholder believes that a director is acting inappropriately in their duties to the company, it is possible to apply to the court for permission to bring a claim in the name of the company against the individual director.

Any remedy ordered by the court will be for the immediate benefit of the company, not the shareholder themselves.

Specialist legal advice should be obtained on the merits of taking this course of action but sometimes a shareholder will consider it the most cost-effective, and direct, way to force a director’s hand and return the company to its proper position.

What is an unfair prejudice petition?

Under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, it is open to a shareholder to petition the court where it is alleged that the company’s affairs are being conducted in a manner which is unfairly prejudicial to all or some of its shareholders.

Common grounds for bringing an unfair prejudice petition include the following:

  • Misappropriation of company assets.
  • Mismanagement of company affairs.
  • Failure to pay reasonable dividends or retaining dividend payments without justification.
  • Improper allotment of shares.
  • Failure to consult with or provide information to the shareholder.

The remedy is most often used by shareholders with a minority shareholding, but it can be used in circumstances where there is a “quasi partnership” (a company operating in effect as a partnership of individuals) or where there is a 50/50 shareholding.

In most cases, the aggrieved shareholder will want a buyout of their shares at fair value, but the court can exercise a wide range of options including ordering a buyout of the other shareholders and ordering changes in the management of the company.

To succeed, the shareholder will need to prove both that the conduct is prejudicial (causing some harm or prejudice to their interest as a shareholder) and that it is unfair (objectively assessed against the context of a commercial relationship). The court will consider the position objectively and consider whether a hypothetical reasonable bystander would regard the conduct as satisfying these criteria.

What is just and equitable winding up?

This is a “nuclear option” which can potentially arise where relationships have broken down to such an extent that the company cannot continue operating.

In those circumstances, a shareholder (assuming they have held their shares for more than 18 months) can apply to the court to wind the whole company up but will need to show, as a prerequisite to the petition being granted, that there will be assets available for distribution to the shareholders once the company has been wound up.

Grounds that a court may consider suitable to justify a winding up may include the issues listed above in support of an unfair prejudice petition.

However, winding up is not guaranteed as it is at the court’s discretion as to whether to order it. The court may be reluctant to wind up a company which is in a good financial position, particularly if the shareholder has other options open to them and/or an offer is made to buy the shareholder’s shares for fair value.

Conclusion

There is a range of options available to shareholders if they are concerned about how a company is being managed and the impact on the value of their shareholding or the level of their dividend income.

This is a complex area, and this article only touches on the options available. Each situation is different, being affected by a wide range of legal and practical factors.

Early involvement from a specialist dispute resolution lawyer will help identify viable remedies and should ideally promote an upfront discussion between the parties before matters escalate as far as the courts. The English courts advocate parties exploring alternative means of resolution, such as mediation, and these options can be explored at any stage in the process.

If you have any questions arising from this article or have any issues you wish to discuss, whatever stage these may be at, please contact either Richard Gore (richard.gore@templebright.com or 07916 160387) or Claire Boucher (claire.boucher@templebright.com or 07939 288777)

This article is not legal advice, which it may be sensible to obtain before you take any decisions or actions in the areas covered.

Claire Boucher – is a partner at Temple Bright. She handles Dispute Resolution matters with a focus on company disputes (including shareholder disputes, unfair prejudice petitions, breach of directors’ duties, breach of warranty claims, derivative actions and breach of joint venture and shareholder agreements) and disputes concerning allegations of civil fraud (including misrepresentation, conspiracy, unjust enrichment, dishonest assistance, knowing receipt, misappropriation of company funds, and breach of fiduciary duties). Claire has a particular specialism in crisis management work, including fraud and injunctions. She is experienced in dealing with interim applications, including search and disclosure orders, as well as dealing with complex asset recovery and enforcement of international judgments in England and Wales. Claire also advises and acts for clients on contractual dispute matters (including cross border commercial contract disputes), debt recovery, and applications under the Companies Act, including applications to amend filing errors or inaccuracies at Companies House, and company restorations.

Richard Gore – is a partner at Temple Bright. He handles Dispute Resolution matters across a wide range of commercial areas but with a particular focus on director and shareholder disputes, including breaches of fiduciary duties and unfair prejudice petitions. He also deals with contentious commercial landlord and tenant disputes. He is described in legal directories as “extremely practical, totally unflappable and deals with the pressures of litigation exceptionally well” and as someone with “the perfect balance of seriousness and commerciality. He wants first and foremost to resolve disputes but if you can’t, he’s ready to roll his sleeves up and fight. He’s a good person to work with.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Why it’s time for law firms to embrace smart identity infrastructure

ChatControl is an Invasion of Our Digital Living Spaces

New measures to tackle fraud come into effect

Comments are closed.

Follow SME Today on Linkedin and share all the topics you find interesting

The Newsletter

Join our mailing list for the best SME stories, handpicked and delivered direct to your inbox every two weeks!

Sign Up
Personal Pension offer
Events Calendar
    • Marketing
    September 9, 2025

    SEO 101 for SMBs: Reaching Customers with the Right Visuals

    August 29, 2025

    OneMetric forms strategic partnership with RevOps expert to drive UK growth

    • Finance
    September 3, 2025

    Five ways to monetise your business EV chargers

    September 1, 2025

    Are you flying blind on your most important business decisions?

    • People
    September 11, 2025

    New Chief Revenue Officer joins CBS to drive strategic growth

    August 14, 2025

    A Life Worth Saving – A Tribute to Dame Stephanie Shirley CH, 1933–2025

    • Health & Safety
    September 2, 2025

    1 in 3 employees anxious about lack of first aiders at work

    July 1, 2025

    Temperatures Soaring: Is Your Workplace Becoming Unsafe?

    • Events
    September 9, 2025

    Nominations for the 2026 Bold Woman Award by Veuve Clicquot open

    July 22, 2025

    South West Expo Delivers Outstanding Event at Swindon’s STEAM Museum

    • Community
    July 11, 2025

    Building community, one cause at a time

    June 23, 2025

    Celebrating One Year In Fairford Supporting The Community

    • Food & Drink
    August 22, 2025

    How to get stocked by major retailers as an SME

    July 18, 2025

    Warning to Small Businesses Over New Food Waste Regulations

    • Books
    September 3, 2025

    New book on conquering fear of public speaking

    August 7, 2025

    Learning to Leave a Legacy in Business

    About

    SME Today is published by the same team who deliver The Great British Expos’. We have been organising various corporate events for the last 10 years, with a strong track record of producing well managed and attended business events across the UK.

    Join Our Mailing List

    Receive the latest news and updates from SMEToday.
    Read our Latest Newsletter:


    Sign Up
    X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    Categories
    • Books
    • Community & Charity
    • Education and Training
    • Environment
    • Events
    • Features
    • Finance
    • Food and Drink
    • Health & Safety
    • HR & Recruitment
    • In Profile
    • Legal
    • Marketing
    • News
    • People
    • Property & Development
    • Sponsored Content
    • Technology
    • Transport & Tourism
    • Wellbeing & Mental Health
    • ABOUT SME TODAY: THE GO TO RESOURCE FOR UK BUSINESSES
    • Editorial Submission Guidelines
    • Privacy
    • Contact
    Copyright © 2025 SME Today.
    • ABOUT SME TODAY: THE GO TO RESOURCE FOR UK BUSINESSES
    • Editorial Submission Guidelines
    • Privacy
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.