Drawing on decades of experience advising global enterprises, Tim Grieveson, Chief Information Security Officer at ThingsRecon, explores how the rapid digitisation of supply chains has reshaped security — and why Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are becoming central to safeguarding this new ecosystem.
It may sound surprising, but no organisation truly owns its supply chain anymore. What was once a neat list of vendors now looks more like a tangled web of SaaS providers, cloud platforms, open-source dependencies, logistics partners, and fourth-party suppliers you’ve never even heard of. Each of those links is both an enabler of your business and a potential exposure point. The problem is, while the chain has grown more complex, the threats targeting it have grown sharper.
Consider the now infamous SolarWinds attack, which brought thousands of businesses and agencies to their knees, including the US government. Or the MOVEit incident, in which a zero-day vulnerability in a file transfer programme left businesses like British Airways and the BBC exposed to ransomware. The patterns here are the same: a single compromise or vulnerability cascades across hundreds or thousands of downstream organisations that had no knowledge of the risk until it was too late. It was a wake-up call for boards and executives who were met with an uncomfortable reality – traditional procurement checks, and annual audits no longer measure up against the dynamic, real-time attack surface in which they find themselves.
This is where Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are having to step up. At their best, they act as an extension of the enterprise’s security function, offering around-the-clock monitoring, standardised practices across fragmented ecosystems, and the ability to translate regulatory obligations into operational discipline. For mid-sized companies without the resources to build enterprise-grade security in-house, MSPs can provide access to the same expertise, tooling, and incident response capabilities that their larger peers rely on. But while the case for MSPs is strong, the risk of over-reliance is equally real. Without proper oversight, transparency, and contractual clarity, the very partnerships designed to close security gaps can end up opening new ones. The challenge for leaders, then, is not whether to use MSPs – that decision is already being made across industries – but how to integrate them strategically into the governance of supply chain security.
Why MSPs are now more ‘partner’ than ‘provider’
In most organisations, the security team is already running at full stretch just trying to defend the perimeter. Expecting them to also map, monitor, and manage a sprawling web of third- and fourth-party dependencies is like throwing in some hurdles, pits, and a long jump at the end. It simply isn’t feasible. That’s why MSPs have had to evolve from peripheral providers to core partners. Their value lies in reach and continuity: the ability to watch for threats that emerge at any point in the supply chain, not just within the walls of the enterprise. With 24/7 monitoring, dedicated threat intelligence, and scalable resources, MSPs can provide the kind of persistent vigilance that individual organisations would struggle to maintain on their own.
Just as important, MSPs bring consistency to an ecosystem that is anything but consistent. Every vendor, platform, and integration has its own security baseline, which means a business relying on dozens of suppliers is, in practice, inheriting dozens of different risk postures. By applying standardised controls and compliance frameworks, MSPs can smooth out those variations, reducing the weak spots that attackers so often exploit. It’s a technical win for boards, but it’s also a governance win. It translates a fragmented, opaque landscape into something measurable, reportable, and, most importantly, defensible in the face of tightening regulations. MSPs might not have the power to eliminate the complexity of modern supply chains, but they do help ensure that complexity doesn’t automatically equal vulnerability.
A marker in the sand
A supply chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and in practice, that weak link is usually inconsistency. One vendor may follow strict patching cycles and compliance frameworks, while another cuts corners on updates or lacks visibility into its own subcontractors. Multiply that inconsistency across dozens or even hundreds of suppliers, and the result is a patchwork of exposures that no single organisation can realistically untangle. This is where MSPs add their magic. By introducing common baselines for monitoring, reporting, and compliance, they impose a degree of standardisation that individual organisations struggle to enforce on their own. The end result, when done well, is to bring discipline to a security ecosystem that is otherwise fractured and unpredictable.
Just as importantly, MSPs give enterprises the ability to respond faster when disruptions inevitably occur. A breach in a single supplier’s system can ripple outward with alarming speed, but MSP-led response frameworks can contain incidents before they escalate into wider crises. They also reduce duplication of effort; rather than every company in a supply chain reinventing its own protocols, MSPs can apply tested frameworks consistently across multiple tiers.
For those with a seat at the boardroom table, this consistency serves to extend visibility and resilience into places they cannot directly reach or influence. Put simply, MSPs act as force multipliers – a marker in the sand that amplifies security, response and continuity across the entire network.